
The battle to become Norwich's next MP is underway today after Ian Gibson sensationally quit on a tumultuous day for the Labour party.
A by-election for Norwich North was triggered when an emotional Dr Gibson broke his silence after he was caught up in the Westminster expenses scandal and announced his resignation.
The 70-year-old spoke at The Forum yesterday afternoon of his “devastation” after his party barred him from standing in the next election in what he described as a “fait accompli”.
He said he was “bowed but not broken” but said he wanted to quit immediately because his position between now and the next election had become “untenable”.
That means voters in Norwich North will go to the polls, although when this will be is still unclear with some speculation it could be delayed as Labour searches for a suitable candidate to fill Dr Gibson's shoes.
Dr Gibson came under fire when it emerged he had spent £80,000 of taxpayers' money to pay the mortgage interest, council tax and bills on the London flat he had listed as a second home.
His daughter Helen and her boyfriend were living in the flat and last year Dr Gibson sold the flat to the couple for £162,000, equal to the amount of remaining mortgage, but less than the £195,000 he paid for it 10 years ago and below the market rate.
Dr Gibson's daughter, who is a civil servant, lived in the flat for several years after he bought it in 1999.
But he insisted he had lived in it for three to five nights a week while in London on parliamentary business.
He was one of four MPs to be told by Labour's so-called 'star chamber' that he cannot stand at the next election.
However, he said he felt that panel had made up its mind he was going before he was interviewed.
He said: “It's ridiculous. If I knew what I had done wrong I could fight back.
“Although I was told it was not to be a disciplinary hearing, it turned out to be so. I was allowed to bring one 'silent friend' with me and Martin Booth, President of Norwich Constituency Labour Party, offered to accompany me.
“He has commented elsewhere that their final decision was a fait accompli and I have to agree. I felt the panel had made their mind up prior to the interview and the considerable local and national support from constituents and non-constituents, although available, was not examined.”
After his 12 years of public service came to an abrupt end, Dr Gibson said: “I wish to publically thank the hundreds of people who sent me messages of support. The decision of the NEC leaves me today bowed but not broken. However I believe my position as an MP between now and the next election is untenable.”
Dr Gibson added: “The panel asked me if I felt my actions contravened the 2009 Code of Conduct clause in The Green Book, which states that claims should not give rise to 'improper personal financial benefits to themselves or anyone else'.
“This clause did not feature in Codes of Conduct in Green Books prior to 2009, when my daughter and her partner were living with me and when I sold my property to them, and even if it had I do not believe that there was anything improper about my actions. It still remains unclear which rule I have broken and I have not received the verdict in writing yet.”
He added: “The issue of my selling-on my second home below the market price begs the question why did I not sell it on the open market and make a profit? Some MPs did and, no doubt, gave or shared the proceeds with their family members.
“In my case I was not motivated by making a profit. I received the equivalent of the mortgage loan for the flat, namely £162,000 which was due to be repaid in November 2009. I will be required to repay an additional loan incurred by having to re-mortgage my first home in Norwich in order to buy the flat for £195,000 in 1999.
“It was, and will be, my personal money and not the taxpayers' which will be used to pay-off the re-mortgage. This helped to reduce the mortgage interest payments made by the taxpayer for my second home. I will, of course, be paying Capital Gains Tax on the sale of my second home, the exact amount of which will be determined in consultation with my accountant when preparing my 2008-09 tax return later this year.”
And he said he had not covered up the fact his daughter was living with him, with her name and that of her partner appearing on the electoral register.
He added he would not run as an independent and said it would havee been nice to have “gone out on a high and become Lord Mayor”.
But he said his politics would “never die”, he refused to say Gordon Brown should go and said he would continue living in Norwich.
Martin Booth, chairman of the Norwich Labour Party, also added his resignation to the growing pile of Labour stalwarts who have stepped down, and expressed anger at the way Dr Gibson had been treated.
Mr Booth, who has been a member of the party for 30 years and will now leave politics completely, said the treatment of Dr Gibson was a “gross injustice”.
He added: “For some time now I've been unhappy with the government and the party nationally, however I'd have stayed on helping to run the local party with my local colleagues but now I've had enough.”
Charles Clarke, MP for Norwich South, who may have to look after Norwich North while the by-election arrangements are thrashed out, said: “I'm sorry that Ian Gibson has decided to resign.
“I extend my best wishes to his family who've supported him through this. Though we've had our political disagreements on certain issues I've always respected Ian and continue to do so.”
Dr Gibson's resignation came as Prime Minister Gordon Brown refused to bow to calls to go from his own party after Labour suffered humiliation in the local elections, losing four remaining county councils to the Tories.
Mr Brown was rocked by a string of resignations as he reshuffled his cabinet, including Europe Minister Caroline Flint, who accused him of using women ministers as “little more than female window dressing”.
Who Labour will turn to in an effort to cling on to Norwich North is still unclear, but Phil Taylor, head of communications at Norwich City College, and a former advisor to Peter Hain, has been touted as a possible candidate.
But he was today keeping mum on whether he would put himself forward.
He said: “I think he (Ian Gibson) has been treated terribly by the party. I think he was subject to a kangaroo court and I quite understand why he feels so let down by the party. Ian has been an incredibly hard working MP.”
Adrian Holmes, The Green Party candidate for the Norwich North seat, added he thought Labour would struggle to fill Dr Gibson's shoes.
He said: “Ian Gibson built up quite a strong personal following. He was often at odds with the Labour officials so I think it's going to be difficult for them.
“I feel from what I've read he wasn't treated very well by the NEC and I think he's probably doing the honourable thing in standing down.”
Bill Holden, who will stand as an independent, said: “In terms of my campaign it won't make too much difference. I think it was time for him to retire. I just think there would be angst and worry for him.”
John Cowen, vice chairman of the Norfolk Labour Party, has been selected as the Labour candidate in South East Cambridgeshire, but last week made clear he fancied a shot at Norwich North. He said: “Ian had to make his own decision and know it would have been a touch decision. I have a lot of faith in Labour in Norwich North.”
Chloe Smith, the Conservative candidate for Norwich North, added: “I wish Dr Gibson all the best. I think he's been a very good MP up until now and I look forward to the campaign.”
Norwich City Council leader Steve Morphew and his partner Maggie Wheeler, who were both tipped to put their names forward to challenge for the seat, yesterday said they had no intention of doing so.
Norwich Evening News